How to manually update Virus Definitions in ESET Version 8
Tavis Ormandy, June Introduction Many antivirus products include emulation capabilities that are intended to allow unpackers to run for a few cycles before signatures are applied. Unfortunately, analysis of ESET emulation reveals that is not the case and it can be trivially compromised. This is not a theoretical risk, recent evidence suggests a growing interest in anti-virus products from advanced attackers. FAQ Which platforms are affected?
Index of /updates/eset/
On August 27, , a so-called zero-day vulnerability affecting Microsoft Windows was published on GitHub and publicized via a rather acerbic tweet. Twitter It seems obvious that this was not part of a coordinated vulnerability disclosure and there was no patch at the time this tweet since deleted was published to fix the vulnerability. LPE allows an executable or process to escalate privileges. In that specific case, it allows an executable launched by a restricted user to gain administrative rights.
The tweet linked to a GitHub repository that contains Proof-of-Concept code for the exploit. Not only was a compiled version released — the source code was also. As one could have predicted, it took only two days before we first identified the use of this exploit in a malicious campaign from a group we have dubbed PowerPool. This group has a small number of victims and according to both our telemetry and uploads to VirusTotal we only considered manual uploads from the web interface , the targeted countries include Chile, Germany, India, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States and Ukraine.
PowerPool arsenal This newly isolated group already has quite a range of tools at its disposal. We will provide brief analyses of some of them here. They modified the source code slightly and recompiled it. The exploit has been documented by its original author and has been covered by security researchers and CERTs. Thus, a user can have write permissions on any file in C: That allows a user with only read permissions to replace the content of a write-protected file.
As any user is able to write in C: Then, by calling the broken function SchRpcSetSecurity, it is possible to gain write access to that target file. To create a Local Privilege Escalation, the attacker needs to choose the target file that will be overwritten.
This needs to be done carefully: For example, it can be a system file, or the updater of previously installed software that is regularly executed by a task. The final step is to replace the content of this protected target file with malicious code.
Thus, at the next automatic execution, the malware will have administrative rights regardless of its original rights. This is the legitimate updater for Google applications and is regularly run under administrative privileges by a Microsoft Windows task. Figure 2 — Creation of a hardlink to the Google Updater Figure 3 — Abuse of SchRpcCreateFolder to change the permissions of the Google Updater executable The sequence of operations shown in the figure above allows the PowerPool operators to gain write access to the executable GoogleUpdate.
Then, they overwrite it with a copy of their second-stage malware, described below, in order to gain SYSTEM privileges the next time the updater is called. Initial compromise The PowerPool group uses different approaches to initially compromise a victim. One is to send emails with their first-stage malware as an attachment. On the other hand, we know that their spams have been spotted in the past. Microsoft Excel can load these files that update a cell and force Excel to execute PowerShell code.
First-stage backdoor This is basic malware used for reconnaissance on the machine. It comprises two Windows executables. The first of these is the main backdoor. It establishes persistence through a service. Figure 5 — Gathering of proxy information The second of these executables has a single purpose.
This file can then be exfiltrated by the main backdoor. Second-stage backdoor This malware is downloaded via the first stage, presumably when the operators believe the machine is interesting enough for them to stay on it for a longer time.
However, it is clearly not a state-of-the-art APT backdoor. This backdoor seeks commands from http: These additional files are mainly the lateral-movement tools mentioned below. The supported commands are:
Then save out any changes or not that you wish to make to the task before waiting for it to fire again. Alternatively, the most surefire way to re-run a task is to right click on the existing task, select “duplicate task”, and use slightly different name for the task. As long as the duplicate is set to run ASAP, it will do so as you’d expect. With respect to sorting out which client need the updated Endpoint 6, there are a couple ways to accomplish this. Best practice is to create a Dynamic Group that uses a sorting template with rules that rope in any clients with:
VIDEO: Popular Topics
to the latest 6.x version. Applies to: ESET Remote Administrator | Product version: 6.x Perform a manual component-based upgrade of ERA. I want to update ESET Nod32 antivirus, but I want to do so while offline. Offline updates legally is possible in Business Edition of Eset Nod Although ESET Version 8 can update regularly and automatically, there may be a time when you want to manually update your virus definitions. This guide will.